Scientific Journal

Applied Aspects of Information Technology

PARADIGM OF DIFFERENCE: PERSON AND TECHNOLOGY IN THE CONDITIONS OF INFORMATION REDUNDANCY
Abstract:
The paper solves an important methodological and practical problem, which is to increase the safety of interactionof different classes systems in the conditions of information redundancyon the basic principles of thinking in complexity.The aim of the work is to investigate the possibility of a non-traumatic connection of different classes’ systems “person” [P], “technology” [T], “environment” [E] into a single macrosystem.Theoretical basis. The study of the key provisions of the safety problem of the complex system “person–technology–environment” [P–T–E] is considered in the context of the basic principles of post-non-classics and “thinking in complexity”, which allowed us to take into account the dimensionality and diversity of the systems included in the macrosystem [P–T–E]. It is shown that the macrosystem “person–technology–environment” [P–T–E] is complex, characterized by openness, self-organization, human- and psycho-dimensionality, non-linear development and instability. It is hypothesized that the main cause of the accident is a certain incompatibility within the macrosystem [P–T–E] of the systems [P], [T], [E] connected in it in terms of membership in different classes (1), which causes the emergence of a critical difference for the interaction of complex systems of different classes (2) Originality. For the first time, the concept of a complex macrosystem of a new type is introduced, connecting systems of different classes as independent “whole” on the basis of the conceptual model of post-non-classical “whole in a whole”.Conclusions.The growth of road traffic accidents is formed by the joint interaction of “different-quality” systems “person/driver” [PD], “technology/car” [TC], “environment” [E] into a single macrosystem. The new quality of the macrosystem [PD–TC–E] is determined by the nature of the bonds and the emergence of consistency/or mismatch between different integrity in a single macrosystem.It was established the need to accept a difference paradigm as a scientific branch on the basis of the methodology of non-traumatic/ecological connection without combining the multiclass subsystems into a single macrosystem with a mega-control. The proposed recommendations contribute to improving road safety.
Authors:
Keywords
DOI
//10.15276/aait.02.2019.5
References
  1. Arshinov, V. I. (2012). Slozhnost’ postneklassicheskih praktik i budushchee konvergiruushchih tehnologiy, [Thecomplexityofpost-non-classicalpracticesandthefutureofconvergingtechnologies], in:Post-non-classical practices: the experience of conceptualization:a collective monograph pod obshch. red. V. I. Arshinova i О. N. Astaf’evoy, Mіr,Publ.,Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, pр. 164-188 (in Russian).
  2. Goncharova, O. E. (2016). Postneklassicheskie podkhody v proektirovanii systemi “voditel–avtomobil–sreda” dlya obespecheniya eyo besopasnosti, [Post-non-classical approaches in the design of the “driver – car – environment” system to ensure its safety], in: Scientific and technical journal “Electrical and Computer Systems”,No. 23 (99), Science and Technology Publ., Odessa, Ukraine, pp. 210-218 (in Russian).
  3. Goncharova, O. E. (2017). Metodologicheskiye podkhody k issledovaniyu slozhnoy makrosistemy tipa “voditel'–avtomobil'–sreda” [V–A–S], [Methodological approaches to the study of a complex macrosystem such as “driver – car – environment” [D–C–E]], in: Scientific journal “Philosophy of Science: traditions and innovations”, No. 1 (15), Publishing House of Sumy State Pedagogical University named after A. S. Makarenko Publ., Sumy, pp. 130-142 (in Russian).
  4. Goncharova,O. (2018). “Can the Tripartite “Driver-Car-Environment” System save Lives?””ROCZNIK ADMINISTRACJI PUBLICZNEJ, Wydawca Publ., Krakow, Poland, pp. 219-231. DOI 10.4467/24497800RAP.18.013.9228, Url: Can the Tripartite 'Driver-Car-Environment' System Save Lives?
  5. Gorokhov, V. G. (2016). Evolutsiyaslozhnostitekhnicheskihsystem, [The evolution of the complexity of technical systems],in: Innovative complexity, E. N. Knyazeva (ed.),Publishing House Aletheia, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, pp. 446-468 (in Russian).
  6. Danilov, Yu. A., & Kadomtsev, B. B. (1983). Chtotakoesinergetika?[What is synergetics?],in:Nonlinearwaves. Self-organization, Science Publ., Moscow, Russian Federation, pp. 30-43 (in Russian).
  7. Kingsley Dennis, & John Urry. (2009). “After the Car”, Polity Press Publ, Cambridge, UK, 254 р.
  8. Kozyrev, I. A., & Yezersky, V. B. (2017). Peredovaya ekonomika Ukraini, [Ukraine's advanced economy], Url: http://www.trinitas.ru/rus/doc/0016/001e/00163186.htm (in Russian).
  9. Ershova-Babenko, I. V. & Goncharova, O. E. (2015). Makromodel “voditel–avtomobil–sreda” i problema vzaimodejstviya system raznogo klassa v aspekte kontseptualnoj modeli psikhosinergetiki “tseloe v tselom”, [The “driver-car-environment” macromodel and the problem of interaction of systems of different classes in the aspect of the psychosynergic concept “whole in whole” model], in: Scientific Herald of the International Huma-nitarian University, Series: History. Philosophy. Politology, Issue 10, Odessa, Ukraine, pp. 52-58 (in Russian).      
  10. Ershova-Babenko, I. V. (2015). Psykho-sinergetika, [Psychosynergy], Grin S.V. Publ., Kherson, Ukraine, 432 p. (in Russian).
  11. Gashchuk, P. M. (1998). Energo preobrazu yushchiye sistemy avtomobilya. Identifikatsiya i analiz, [Energy conversion systems of the car. Identification and analysis], Publ. RVV KHSCRTU, Kharkov, Ukraine,272 p. (in Russian).
  12. Knyazeva, E. N., & Kurdyumov, S. P. (1994). Zakony evolutsii i samoorganizatsii slozhnyh system, [Laws of evolution and self-organization of complex systems], Science Publ., Moscow, Russian Federation, 236 p. (in Russian).
  13. Laszlo, E. (2004). Makrosdvig: К ustoychivosti mira kursom peremen, [Macrosview: To the stability of the world of change], Science Publ., Moscow, Russian Federation, 207 p. (in Russian).
  14. Leny, X. (2011). Sotsialnaya otvetstvennost cheloveka za nadezhnost slozhnyh sotsioteh-nicheskih system, [The social responsibility of man for the reliability of complex socio-technical systems], [in:] Synergetic paradigm: Synergetics of innovation complexity, V. I. Arshinov [ed.], Progress-Tradition Publ., Moscow, Russian Federation, pp. 237-258 (in Russian).
  15. Mainzer, K. (2016). Issleduya slozhnost: ot iskustvennoy zhizni i iskustvennogo intellekta k kiberfizicheskim sistemam, [Investigating comp-lexity: from artificial life and artificial intelligence to cyber-physics systems], in:Innovative complexity, E. N. Knyazeva (ed.),Publishing House Aletheia Publ., Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation,pp. 469-508 (in Russian).
  16. Moren, E. (2013). Меtod. Priroda Prirody [Method. Nature of Nature], “Canon +” center “Rehabilitation” Publ., 2nd ed., Moscow, Russian Federation, 488 p. (in Russian).
  17. Nikolis, G.m. and Prigogine, I. (1990). Poznanie slozhnogo. Vvedenie [Knowledge of the complex. Introduction], Publishing House “Mir” Publ., Moscow, Russian Federation, 342 p. (in Russian).
  18. Prigogine, I. (1985). Ot sushchestvu-ushchego k voznikaushchemu: vremya i slozhnost v fizicheskih naukah, [From the Existing to the Emerging: Time and Complexity in the Physical Sciences], Science Publ., Moscow, Russian Federation, 327 p. (in Russian).
  19. Prigogine, I. (1991). Filosofiya nestabil-nosti, [Philosophy of Instability], in: Questions of Philosophy, Issue 6, Science Publ., Moscow, Russian Federation, pp. 46-57 (in Russian).
  20. Styopin, V. S. (2000). Teoreticheskoe zna-nie [Theoretical knowledge], Progress-Tradition Publ., Moscow, Russian Federation, 712 p. (in Russian).
  21. Styopin, V. S. (1989). Nauchnoye poznaniye I tsennosti tekhnogennoy tsivilizatsii [Scientific knowledge and values of technogenic civilization] in: Questions of Philosophy, Issue 10, Science Publ. Moscow, Russian Federation, pp. 3-18 (in Russian).
  22. Taleb, Nassim Nicholas, (2014). Antikhrupkost’. Kak izvlech vygodu iz haosa [Antifragile. Things that gain from disorder], Kolibri, Azbuka-Atticus Publ., Moscow, Russian Federation, 768 p. (in Russian).
  23. Haken, H. (1991). Informatsiya i samoorganizatsiya: makroskopitcheskiy podhod к slozhnym yavleniyam, [Information and self-organization: a macroscopic hike to complex phenomena], Publishing house “Mir” Publ., Moscow, Russian Federation, 240 p. (in Russian).
  24. Haken, Н. (1983). Synergetics. An Introduction [in:] Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions in Physics, Chemistry and Biology, 3., erw. Aufl., Springer Publ., Berlin, Germany, 390 p.
  25. Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). “Order out of Chaos. Man’s new dialogue with nature”, Heinemann Publ., London, Great Britain, 430 p.
  26. Mainzer, K. (2007). “Thinking in Complexity, The Computational Dynamics of Matter, Mind, And Mankind”, 5th edition, New York, Amerika, 456 р.
Published:
Last download:
22 Nov 2019

[ © KarelWintersky ] [ All articles ] [ All authors ]
[ © Odessa National Polytechnic University, 2018.]